The Inflation Update: December 2002

Stephen G. Cecchetti

16 January 2002

 

            Yesterday’s lunch cost me about 10% more than it did last month. As I paid, I wondered whether this was a sign of increased inflation. The answer came in this morning’s inflation report: the price increase at my lunch counter is probably just a sign of how long it’s been since this proprietor raised prices than of any overall surge in the price of restaurant food.  The food away from home component in today's CPI report – prices in the menu sector – is a good measure of the inflation trend and they have been rising at a fairly steady 2% annual rate for some time now.  I can’t remember the last time the price of my lunch changed, and so if you told me it was 4 or 5 years ago, I believe it.

 

The steady, low inflation in the price of restaurant meals is not really representative of the rest of this morning’s BLS Consumer Price Index report, which confirms that inflation has been gradually falling.  Headline inflation was up a very modest 0.7% (annual rate) for the month of December, far below the average of 2.4% for the year 2002. Core measures are moderating as well, with CPI excluding food and energy up 1.3% (a.r.) for the month and 1.9% for the year, and the Median CPI (computed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland) rose a modest 2.3% at an annual rate, substantially less than its 3% year over year change.

 

            The details of the report provide ample support for the view that inflation has moved below 2˝% per year.  Core goods prices were down again, falling by 4% (a.r.) in December, while core services prices are up only 2.8% (a.r.) for the month.[1]   Overall, the continued increases in housing services and medical care are balancing off the declines in prices of apparel, cars, computers and mobile phones. After reading various press reports, I wonder if some part of the a combination of the pressure on retailers to lower prices what statisticians call a "seasonal adjustment" problem.  The holiday season has normally been one of high prices, with cuts coming in January.  But over the past few years, retailers have become much more sophisticated, cutting prices earlier to try and push up December sales figures.  Seasonal adjustment based on past patterns would magnify these price declines.  If I’m right, the result will be a reversal next month.

 

            Still, my conclusion from all of this is that there is no reason yet for anyone to panic.  There’s nothing new in this report for the deflation doomsayers – below average prices increases continue to be negative, but the average remains well above zero.  And there’s not much for the inflation hawks either – core measures show signs of falling slowly, but the trend is still in the 2 percent range.  As for the FOMC, they will surely view these data as confirmation that the low interest rate policy is not yet creating the risk of increasing inflation.

 

 

Consumer Price Inflation, Various Measures

(Through December 2002, all data at an annual rate)

 

Previous

All Items CPI

CPI ex Food & Energy

Median CPI

1 Month

0.7

1.3

2.3

3 Months

1.8

1.7

2.4

6 Months

2.1

1.9

2.8

12 Months

2.4

1.9

3.1

12 Months ending
December 2001

1.5

2.7

3.9

 

           

 

For previous updates, as well as my occasional essays on current policy issues,

Please visit my home page:
 Steve Cecchetti's Homepage

 

 

 

Detail for Computation of the Median CPI

December 2002

Component

Annualized 1-month % change

Relative Importance

Cumulative Relative Importance

Processed fruits and vegetables    

18.6

0.3

0.3

Nonalcoholic beverages and beverage materials

15.6

1.0

1.2

Fuel oil and other fuels   

10.3

0.2

1.4

Tenants'  and household insurance    

10.1

0.4

1.8

Public transportation        

9.1

1.2

3.0

Fresh fruits and vegetables        

7.2

1.0

3.9

Gas (piped) and electricity         

6.4

3.4

7.3

Motor vehicle insurance     

6.1

2.5

9.8

Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs      

6.1

2.2

12.0

Motor vehicle maintenance and repair 

5.8

1.4

13.5

Tobacco and smoking products          

5.5

1.0

14.4

Medical care services        

4.9

4.6

19.1

Education           

4.8

2.9

21.9

Water and sewer and trash collection services

4.3

0.9

22.8

Miscellaneous personal goods         

3.9

0.2

23.0

Miscellaneous personal services      

3.5

1.6

24.6

Owners' equivalent rent of primary residence  

3.4

22.6

47.2

Recreation           

2.3

6.0

53.2

Food away from home         

2.0

6.3

59.5

Footwear            

2.0

0.9

60.3

Jewelry and watches          

1.8

0.4

60.7

Rent of primary residence   

1.8

6.6

67.3

Other food at home         

1.5

1.8

69.1

Dairy and related products          

1.4

0.9

70.0

Alcoholic beverages         

1.3

1.0

71.0

Medical care commodities     

0.5

1.4

72.4

Communication       

0.0

3.0

75.4

Personal care services      

0.0

0.9

76.3

Motor vehicle fees          

-1.0

0.6

76.9

Used cars and trucks       

-1.6

2.1

79.0

Motor vehicle parts and equipment    

-2.2

0.4

79.4

Lodging away from home      

-3.0

2.7

82.1

New vehicles      

-4.2

5.0

87.1

Personal care products      

-6.1

0.7

87.8

Women's and girls' apparel   

-6.1

1.8

89.5

Household furnishings and operations  

-6.4

4.7

94.3

Cereals and bakery products         

-7.6

1.3

95.6

Men's and boys' apparel      

-11.3

1.1

96.7

Motor fuel         

-16.8

3.0

99.7

Infants' and toddlers' apparel        

-18.8

0.2

99.9

Car and truck rental       

-28.1

0.1

100.0

 



[1]A technical note for foreign readers of this update: Unlike most other government statistical agencies, when the BLS removes food from both the “CPI excluding food and energy” and “commodities excluding food and energy commodities,” what I call core goods, they take out all food – raw and prepared.  So my lunch is not in these measures.  Putting it back in wouldn’t affect core CPI, but does have a substantial impact on core goods – raising it from –4% to –2.8% for the month and from –1.5% to –0.7% for the year.  I wish that the BLS would change this to the more conventional “excluding raw food and energy.”