Brandeis University, Philosophy Department
Fall 2013
Brandeis University Web Stite

Philosophy 119A

HUMAN RIGHTS

Professor Andreas Teuber
Andreas Teuber


PAPER TOPIC II

International War
Crime Tribunals
v.
Truth and Reconciliation
Commissions


Drawing on the reading and your own considered opinion and good judgment, answer the question(s) on the following pages. In arguing for your position, think of the arguments that might be made against it, and respond to them. In defending your position, offer what you believe are the most principled arguments you can make.

explodingdog

In thinking of objections to your argument, think of the best possible objections that someone on the other side might be able to come up with, i. e., give yourself a hard time. If you can respond to the other side at its strongest rather than at its weakest point, that can only help to strengthen your own opinion and make it that much more persuasive.

Papers should be double-spaced and between 5 and 6 pages in length, but may be longer if you believe it is absolutely necessary and you have a good reason.

Please number pages.

We would like to have two copies, marked COPY ONE and COPY TWO.

Papers should be stapled, not held together by
Paper CLIP, Elmer's GLUE, Dentyne GUM,
SPIT, James BOND or Origami FOLD.

Papers are due, at the start of class, on Tuesday, November the 19th.



CLICK TO CONTINUE




[PHIL 119A] [Syllabus] [Handouts] [Home] [Bio] [PHIL DEPT.] [E-MAIL]

Send comments to: Andreas Teuber
URL:   http://phils4.dce.harvard.edu/
Last Modified: 10/12/13
Instructor's Toolkit
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College